1.6 - Breakout Session 1: Generating Requirements for BDT

Back to 2024 Agenda

Breakout Session Goal: To develop requirements for BDTs

Charge to Speakers:

The lead for each breakout room can present their thoughts for what they think (straw person) the BDT requirements should be, based on the Group Discussion Questions, below in yellow. Then they can open up for group discussion. There will be two rounds of this exercise.

Charge to Scribes:

Click on this shared Requirements/Assessment Google Document (look for your breakout topic graphics)

Note to IMAG Scribes: if you are unable to open this Google Doc, please ask an audience member to use their computer to project on the screen

Breakout Room A will cover these slide sections

  • VVUQ
  • Math/Stats

Breakout Room B will cover these slide sections

  • Physical Assets/Data Collection/Sensors
  • Virtual to Physical Control Algorithms/Expert in the Loop

Breakout Room C will cover these slide sections

  • Ethical, Security Issues
  • Team Science, Governance

Scribes will share the Requirements/Assessment google slide document on the screen in the breakout room and will add thoughts from the group. The same document will be used for both breakout rotations, with a review of the first round's discussions presented to attendees in the second round. At the end of both rounds, each breakout room will have a completed Project Requirements template to serve as a finalized proposed list of requirements. Please help watch the time.

Group Discussion Questions:

  • What are the essential elements required in each BDT component?
  • What must an author/presenter/proposer include to accurately and clearly describe what they are doing so a reader will understand

Collaborative Slide Deck:

2024 IMAG/MSM - Shared Templates - Google Slides

Breakout Room Instructions:

Participants will attend two different breakout rooms during the two rounds of this exercise. They will participate in improving the proposed recommendations presented by the breakout lead.

  1. The breakout room lead will present their thoughts to the attendees and/or open it up for discussion.
  2. The group will share ideas and then narrow in on a few requirements that resonate most strongly.
  3. Breakout groups rotate at 3:15 pm, and the activity is repeated with the second round breakout group to make further refinements.
  4. The breakout room lead will leave the session prepared to report back to the full group on the final draft list of requirements on Tuesday morning.

Breakout Room A:

Breakout Room Lead: Reinhard Laubenbacher, Anirban Chaudhuri

Scribes: Fariba Fahroo, Yuliya Gorb

  • Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification (VVUQ)
  • Mathematical and Statistical Foundations for BDT

Breakout Room B:

Breakout Room Lead: Julian Goldman, Sandy Weininger

Scribes: Julia Berzhanskaya, Yulia Gel

  • Physical Assets/Data Collection/Sensors
  • Virtual to Physical Control Algorithms/Expert in the Loop

Breakout Room C:

Breakout Room Leads: Barbara Evans, Michelle Bennett

Scribes: Hannah Dueck, Elena Sizikova

  • Ethical, Security Issues
  • Team Science, Governance

 

Breakout Room Lead Bios:

Reinhard Laubenbacher
Anirban Chaudhuri
Julian Goldman
Sandy Weininger
Barbara Evans
Michelle Bennett

Scribe Bios:

Virginia Pasour
Fariba Fahroo
Julia Berzhanskaya
Yulia Gel
Hannah Dueck
Elena Sizikova

Comment

Your name
Feilim
Comment

Grace - not sure how best to contact, but Emily reports audio problems room B

Submitted by feilim on Mon, 09/30/2024 - 14:34

Your name
Peter Hunter
Comment

I'm interested in the extent to which there are standards (being adopted by medical device manufacturers) on data and metadata formats associated with encoding time-series signals from wearable and implantable devices.

Submitted by p.hunter@auckl… on Mon, 09/30/2024 - 14:37

Your name
Lealem
Comment

"outside the box approach" for biomechanics data acquisition.
Current approach of acquiring kinematics and dynamics biomechanics data can be logistically challenging (motion capture, force plates, IMU, etc). Specifically, even with devices with the lowest form factor are most applicable in controlled laboratory settings in short bouts.

It would be ideal to have sensors that are directly weaved into the fibers of clothing that can be warn as normal clothing (shoes, socks, pants, shorts, shirt etc). Specifically, the sensors would be an integral part of the fibers of the clothing rather than having a sensor "patched" or "sewn" to the fabric.

The clothing sponsors would be connected to either a wearables or a mobile phone to collect data on the biomechanics of the individual for a wide variety of applications such as
- risk of fall and mechanisms of fall injuries
- athletic performance
- warfighter performance
- risk of repetitive strain injuries due to poor mechanics or high volume activities

and much more.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 09/30/2024 - 17:11

Table sorting checkbox
Off