How should BDT developments teams proceed with integrating ethics into the design, build, development, deployment - should ethicists, lawyers be recruited to each team? Should centralized resources for ethics and legal expertise/consulting be created?

Test comment. 

I wanted to ask how "model calibration" (i.e., the parameters of the system being data-specific) is going to be treated in this roadmap? For instance, are things being "hand tuned", optimized, or formally inferred using statistical ideologies (frequentist vs Bayesian assumptions)? (Apologies if this has already been discussed)

To Grace: maybe we should have a "ethical lessons learned" session in future IMAG meetings. We're going to have blind spots, and community may be the best way to address them.

M&S verification is the process of determining the extent to which an M&S is compliant with its requirements and specifications as detailed in its conceptual models, mathematical models, or other constructs so it includes is both code and model verification: Used to define the domain of Verification: The region enclosing all sets of M&S inputs for which the solution is determined to be correct and satisfy requirements for accuracy and precision.

In regard to the Verification question. M&S verification is the process of determining the extent to which an M&S is compliant with its requirements and specifications as detailed in its conceptual models, mathematical models, or other constructs so it includes is both code and model verification: Used to define the domain of Verification: The region enclosing all sets of M&S inputs for which the solution is determined to be correct and satisfy requirements for accuracy and precision.