[RCA] Integrated multiscale biomaterials experiment and modeling group

Investigators
Markus Buehler, David Kaplan
Contact info (email)
mbuehler@mit.edu, david.kaplan@tufts.edu
1. Define context(s)
reveal new biological insights
Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
Extensive
Primary goal of the model/tool/database

Silk project;
-Replica exchange molecular dynamics is used to develop a structure for the silk chimeras.
-MD is also used to explain the change in integrin folding associated with its activation due to interactions with inorganic surfaces
Silk elastin project:
- Replica exchange molecular dynamics to guide design of elastin domains in SELPs (silk elastin like proteins)

Biological domain of the model
Protein
Structure(s) of interest in the model
Silk - silica chimeras, silk elastin proteins
Spatial scales included in the model
Protein modeled atomistically
Time scales included in the model
10 ns REMD, 20 ns MD
2. Data for building and validating the model
Data for building the model Published? Private? How is credibility checked? Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
in vitro (primary cells cell, lines, etc.)
ex vivo (excised tissues)
in vivo pre-clinical (lower-level organism or small animal)
in vivo pre-clinical (large animal)
Human subjects/clinical
Other: ________________________ experimental results Extensive
Data for validating the model Published? Private? How is credibility checked? Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
in vitro (primary cells cell, lines, etc.)
ex vivo (excised tissues)
in vivo pre-clinical (lower-level organism or small animal)
in vivo pre-clinical (large animal)
Human subjects/clinical
Other: ________________________ experimental results experimental results Extensive
3. Validate within context(s)
Who does it? When does it happen? How is it done? Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
Verification Prof. Guy Genin April 2020 Reading and verifying appropriateness of computational methods from paper Extensive
Validation Prof. Guy Genin April 2020 Running simulations independently in GROMACS using provided input files Extensive
Uncertainty quantification Prof. Guy Genin April 2020 Additional replicas will be run to determine levels of fluctuation in results Extensive
Sensitivity analysis Prof. Guy Genin April 2020 Extensive
Other:__________
Additional Comments we have transferred all the simulation files, have been going through email correspondence on questions of how to run the REMD code Extensive
4. Limitations
Disclaimer statement (explain key limitations) Who needs to know about this disclaimer? How is this disclaimer shared with that audience? Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
REMD methods can be used across many different protein sequences. Limitation in implementation based on computational resources available to researchers Other researchers planning to run similar simulations Through the MCP Extensive
Running simulations for extended time periods comes at great computational cost People running simulations; Generally known in field Generally known in field Extensive
5. Version control
Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
Extensive
Naming Conventions? Repository? Code Review?
individual modeler No convention No
within the lab N/A N/A
collaborators Validator "_xj" No
6. Documentation
Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
Code commented? Extensive
Scope and intended use described? Extensive
User’s guide? Extensive (through the form of a powerpoint)
Developer’s guide? Extensive
7. Dissemination
Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
Extensive
Target Audience(s): “Inner circle” Scientific community Public
Simulations Link to repository DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201702570 / DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201600236
Models execution input scripts publications
Software Available to group members Open source GROMACS program
Results DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201702570 / DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201600236
Implications of results DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201702570 / DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201600236
8. Independent reviews
Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
Partial
Reviewer(s) name & affiliation: Prof. Guy Genin, Washington University in St.Louis
When was review performed? April 2020
How was review performed and outcomes of the review? in progress
9. Test competing implementations
Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
Adequate
Yes or No (briefly summarize)
Were competing implementations tested? Yes
Did this lead to model refinement or improvement? Yes
10. Conform to standards
Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
Extensive
Yes or No (briefly summarize)
Are there operating procedures, guidelines, or standards for this type of multiscale modeling? Yes; Detailed instructions for simulation methods have been included in the main text of the papers.
How do your modeling efforts conform? Modeling code is commented and provided in NIH repository